Exclusive Content:

Home Office Blunder: Thousands of Deportation-Intended Migrants Missing Before Rwanda Flights

A recent revelation has cast a glaring spotlight on...

Taxes: here is the (large) amount of the advance that the tax authorities will pay you on Monday January 15

The end-of-year holidays have just ended and it is...

Weather: what will the weather be like in February, March and April?

At the start of 2024, the temperatures on the...

Revaluation of pensions: this additional boost refused by the government

spot_img

Brain teaser. In the National Assembly, the reversals of situation are linked… particularly on the question of pensions, which was the subject of amendments and counter-amendments this Tuesday, July 26, 2022, informs Le Parisien. The oppositions, carried by the proposal of the deputy Charles de Courson (Freedoms, Independents, Overseas and Territories) first voted a revaluation of 500 million euros more for retirement pensions. This was to complete the revaluation already decided by the government, of 4%.

However, explain our colleagues, this does not mean that retirees will really be entitled to it.

In fact, specifies the daily Francilien, the lifespan of this amendment will not have exceeded a few hours. A new amendment has indeed been presented, as foreseen by some elected officials interviewed by the press title. “Either the government mobilizes its troops and files an amendment at the end of the text to correct the situation, or it will be done in the Senate. It’s still an amendment to 500 million…”, testifies an elected Les Républicains.

Bruno le Maire, the Minister of the Economy, explained himself in detail about this new version. He indicated that the new amendment tabled was justified because the proposed revaluation was “financed by deducting the sums from the civil and military retirement pensions of the State”. The rejection of the First Amendment was made possible by an agreement between Les Républicains and the presidential formation.

The choice of financing mentioned is surprising but not impossible to explain: the deputy behind the initial amendment planned to make it a warning amendment, aimed at alerting the government. He did not envisage that it would be voted on… and therefore did not think of all the consequences that such a situation could have.

Latest articles

Anne Hathaway Captivates in The Idea of You: A Deep Dive Film Analysis

Anne Hathaway's Compelling Performance: Delving into the Heart of "The Idea of You" Anne Hathaway's...

Nvidia and AMD Stocks React as Semiconductor Sector Faces Turbulence

The semiconductor market experienced significant fluctuations as Nvidia and AMD stocks reacted to industry...

Adrian Newey Announces Departure: Red Bull Racing Faces Transition in F1 Design Leadership

End of an Era: Adrian Newey Announces Departure from Red Bull Racing In a significant...

Home Office Blunder: Thousands of Deportation-Intended Migrants Missing Before Rwanda Flights

A recent revelation has cast a glaring spotlight on the Home Office, as it...

More like this

Home Office Blunder: Thousands of Deportation-Intended Migrants Missing Before Rwanda Flights

A recent revelation has cast a glaring spotlight on the Home Office, as it...

Taxes: here is the (large) amount of the advance that the tax authorities will pay you on Monday January 15

The end-of-year holidays have just ended and it is nice to benefit from an...

Weather: what will the weather be like in February, March and April?

At the start of 2024, the temperatures on the thermometer are enough to make...