Exclusive Content:

Home Office Blunder: Thousands of Deportation-Intended Migrants Missing Before Rwanda Flights

A recent revelation has cast a glaring spotlight on...

Taxes: here is the (large) amount of the advance that the tax authorities will pay you on Monday January 15

The end-of-year holidays have just ended and it is...

Weather: what will the weather be like in February, March and April?

At the start of 2024, the temperatures on the...

The Man from Bruges to attempt a forced sale of a home by a long-standing neighbourly dispute over tree to keep it: It is just to enrich themselves

spot_img

Bruges (brugge) –

we are a long-standing neighbourly dispute over tree, the labour court in Bruges, it is focused on the forced sale of a home. Alan D. has refused for years to get his trees to remove, allowing him to impose periodic penalty payments of more than 800,000 euros have to pay for it.

next door to D. went several times to a justice of the peace, as they have been hindered by the trees, the man. The judge ruled that the trees should be located close to the property line was. Alan D. has been required for the tree to remove it, but refused because they are said to be a big emotional value.

The self-imposed penalties have since been increased to more than 800 000 euros. To make his case, to be able to pay it off early) d) a composition with creditors, to. In the aanzuiveringsplan took the schuldenregelaar the sale of the house, but I do not agree to this. The labour court ruled in december 2018 and that the house is actually sold, shall be in order for the debt to be cleared. That decision was signed) D. appeal to it.

“We’re looking for there are good grounds to have a solution, sir,” argued his lawyer, Ellen Eneman. It has been suggested that the imposition of a penalty payment outside of the composition with creditors and to keep the analogy with the law relating to the bankruptcy. In that case, it would have to be D. to his house and be able to keep up. The attorney for D. wants to, at least, that on this question, a question to the Constitutional Court. – Alain D., stressed at the hearing that such trees as early as February 2015 have been transplanted. “They didn’t have to do it because of the trees, but only to enrich themselves.”

The opposing cast to (d) the grounds and regularly left verwilderen. “It was started up in 2008 or 2009, with a reconciliation to the justice of the peace, but the man didn’t have to talk,” said the master to Peter Becker. According to the neighbors, it has to be D. to his current problems are caused by the compulsory removal of the trees will be a long time in addition to it.

finally, The labour court will pass a judgment on the 18th of October.

Latest articles

Nvidia and AMD Stocks React as Semiconductor Sector Faces Turbulence

The semiconductor market experienced significant fluctuations as Nvidia and AMD stocks reacted to industry...

Adrian Newey Announces Departure: Red Bull Racing Faces Transition in F1 Design Leadership

End of an Era: Adrian Newey Announces Departure from Red Bull Racing In a significant...

Home Office Blunder: Thousands of Deportation-Intended Migrants Missing Before Rwanda Flights

A recent revelation has cast a glaring spotlight on the Home Office, as it...

Boris Johnson Makes Startling Political Comeback Ahead of Pivotal Election

In a surprising turn of events, Boris Johnson has emerged from his political hiatus,...

More like this

Home Office Blunder: Thousands of Deportation-Intended Migrants Missing Before Rwanda Flights

A recent revelation has cast a glaring spotlight on the Home Office, as it...

Taxes: here is the (large) amount of the advance that the tax authorities will pay you on Monday January 15

The end-of-year holidays have just ended and it is nice to benefit from an...

Weather: what will the weather be like in February, March and April?

At the start of 2024, the temperatures on the thermometer are enough to make...