(Montreal) As Quebec prepares to increase its electricity production to achieve its ambitious economic goals, the government is trying to extend an energy agreement that has caused much discontent in Newfoundland and Labrador in recent years.
About 15 per cent of Quebec’s electricity comes from Labrador’s Churchill Falls Dam under a deal that expires in 2041 and is widely seen as unfair to the Atlantic province.
Quebec Premier François Legault wants to not only extend the agreement, but also build another dam on the Churchill River to help Quebec achieve its goal of becoming the “world leader in the green economy.”
But renewing this contract “will not be easy,” warns the scientific director of the Trottier Energy Institute at Polytechnique Montréal, Normand Mousseau.
If extending the Churchill Falls agreement is not essential to meeting Quebec’s energy projects, “we would have problems” if the agreement ends as planned, maintains Mr. Mousseau.
In November, Hydro-Québec released its strategic plan that calls for an increase in production of 60 terawatt hours by 2035. Churchill Falls produces about 30 terawatt hours, and Quebec will have to replace that energy if it cannot reach a deal to extend the contract with Newfoundland and Labrador, recalls Mr. Mousseau.
If Quebec wants to continue to buy electricity produced at Churchill Falls, the government will have to pay more, says Mr. Mousseau, who is also a physics professor at the University of Montreal.
“We pay a fifth of a cent per kilowatt hour, it’s not much,” he emphasizes.
Under the contract concluded in 1969, Quebec was to assume most of the financial risk linked to the construction of the Churchill Falls dam, in exchange for the right to purchase electricity at a fixed price.
This lopsided deal stoked “anti-Quebecois” sentiment in Newfoundland and Labrador, according to Dalhousie University history professor Jerry Bannister.
“There was a kind of angry, combative nationalism that defined energy development. And particularly in Muskrat Falls, it was revenge, it was revenge,” he explains.
The electricity produced by the Muskrat Falls power station, also located on the Churchill River, will therefore be sold to Nova Scotia rather than Quebec. But this project has suffered technical problems and cost overruns: as of June 29, the bill associated with the construction of Muskrat Falls had reached 13.5 billion, while the province had estimated the total cost at 7.4 billion when it approved the project in 2012.
“Anti-Quebec” sentiment may have subsided over time, but Bannister believes the Churchill Falls Accord continues to influence Newfoundland politics.
In September, the Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, Andrew Furey, indicated that the Legault government will have to demonstrate to him that it is prepared to pay more for the energy produced at Churchill Falls if it wishes to extend the CONTRACT.
However, this was the last time that the two men held a meeting on this subject.
On Tuesday, Legault’s office said discussions were continuing, while the Newfoundland and Labrador government said Thursday it wanted to maximize the value of its “assets and future opportunities” along the Churchill River.
Whatever the nature of the negotiations currently taking place, Grand Chief Simon Pokue of the Labrador Innu Nation claims to have been excluded from the negotiations.
“A lot of damage has been done to our land. Our lands are flooded and we will never see them again. No one will ever fix this,” he laments.
Additionally, a portion of the benefits from Muskrat Falls was supposed to go to the Innu Nation, but cost overruns and a refinancing agreement between the federal government and Newfoundland and Labrador limited the funds available.
If Mr. Legault wants to see another dam built on the Churchill River, at Gull Island, the Innu Nation must receive the sums it expected from Muskrat Falls, argues Mr. Pokue.
“They did it once, they won’t do it again,” he warns. It won’t start until we are consulted and involved. »
