“The Anti-Merkel” was the title of the “mirror”, four weeks ago. See Friedrich Merz was in semi-darkness in the black-and-white, with lauerndem views. What he intended to do with Germany, was the main question, which was answered with the attribution of “Anti-Merkel”, the “Süddeutsche Zeitung” had come before, basically: The man turns back the hands of time and pays a bill which he has with the Chancellor and President of the party Chairman of the CDU’s open, since it’s Angela Merkel declined in 2002, the chair of the Union faction in the Bundestag.
Michael Hanfeld
responsible editor for the features section Online and “media”.
F. A. Z.
you have the integrated, he said, in the end, he was the “splitter of the group”, removes the “time” of a, as it is said, “hitherto unknown scientific work” from the year 2005, for which the author of a number of leading politicians of the CDU questioned.
we Understand that as a reference to the three candidates, which today is the 1001 delegates of the Federal party tags to the Chairman election, is the role distribution is clear: Merz polarized, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer integrated, Jens Spahn is the third of laughter as a chance to loose nothing.
With these tags, it started four weeks ago, and they have not changed in the media accompaniment, but solidified. This has to do with the candidates and their respective antecedents, but also with a preconceived perception of the journalists. Merz spoke up, came to equal a certain amount of sharpness to the game and have been checked “the facts,” said Kramp-Karrenbauer, the weighting resilient, even if they became entangled in contradictions. What is Jens Spahn recited, was friendly taken note of.
