New Details have become known so Far, about 39’900 Swiss francs attorney’s fees for LauberIm connection with the disciplinary proceedings against a Federal Prosecutor Michael Lauber have been paid close to 40’000 Swiss francs for legal costs.0 KommentareDie number in a written answer in the question hour of the national Council: Almost 39’900 Swiss francs have been paid.Photo: Yvain Genevay
Now there are more Details to the legal costs of a Federal Prosecutor Michael Lauber in connection with the disciplinary proceedings against his Person. According to the office of the attorney General so far, nearly 39’900 Swiss francs were paid.
The number is in a written answer in the question hour of the national Council. The Supervisory authority of the office of the attorney General (AB-BA) forwarded the question by Olivier Feller (FDP/VD) to the office of the attorney General and their response back to the councils. On Monday, she was published in a written Form.
Thus, the speech is of previously paid costs from 39’889.85 francs. Exactly how the amount will be determined after the final appeal decision of the Federal administrative court finally to. And up to a final scheme being wear once the Federal Prosecutor’s office for these costs.
pay cut of eight percent
Because the question of who has to bear the attorney costs definitely has to be clarified in consultation with the competent committees of the parliamentary oversight, writes the BA. The coordination is the responsibility of the Finance delegation (FinDel). Lauber it to stand to be in the process advocacy representative.
The-BA was opened in may 2019 against Lauber in connection with the procedures of the world football Association, Fifa disciplinary proceedings. In March, the announced-BA, that Federal Prosecutor Lauber got hurt from their point of view, the various duties of the profession. She wants to cut his wages for a year to eight percent.
Against this decision of the Federal Prosecutor when the Federal government filed court made a complaint. The 54-Year-old stressed in the letter that the decision of the Supervisory authority from the 2. March in the disciplinary proceedings against him was not legally valid. He denied also the charges levelled against it “statements, and ratings”.
comments please Log in to comment